The 5 Best AI SEO Tools in 2025 (We Tested Them All — The Results Might Surprise You)
Written by

Ernest Bogore
CEO
Reviewed by

Ibrahim Litinine
Content Marketing Expert

There’s a dangerous trend emerging in the world of AI SEO: some tools claim to help you grow traffic by targeting so-called “high-volume AI queries.” These platforms assign search volume to prompts they believe people are entering into tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity—as if that data exists, and as if everyone is searching with the same words.
The truth is, it doesn’t work that way. No language model shares prompt logs, query counts, or usage frequency. And even if they did, prompt behavior is wildly inconsistent. Two people with the same intent might phrase their questions completely differently depending on their context, experience level, or even how they interact with the AI. That’s why the idea of “prompt volume” is a flawed concept—and building your visibility strategy on it is like building a map with imaginary cities.
Yet this fallacy isn’t the only one making the rounds. Some platforms take things further by promising that, if you use their AI writer and follow their formatting rules, your content will automatically “rank” inside generative engines. That would be compelling—if ranking in a black-box model with no SERP, no CTR, and no documented ranking algorithm was even a thing. It’s not. There is no leaderboard for ChatGPT results. Placement is fluid, context-dependent, and constantly shifting.
Meanwhile, a growing group of AI SEO gurus are selling expensive playbooks built on the same hollow premises. Courses priced at $2,000 or more claim to teach you how to “own AI search,” even though no one—not even the platforms themselves—has clearly defined what that means or how success is measured.
Metrics are vague. Tactics are recycled. The industry is becoming louder, not smarter.
So we decided to ignore the noise and test what actually works.
We selected five of the most talked-about AI SEO tools in 2025. We tested them across three distinct websites: a SaaS platform with moderate domain authority, a local services business with limited organic presence, and a long-form content brand with thousands of indexed pages. The goal was to find out which tools actually help improve visibility in generative engines, and which just generate dashboards.
To make the comparison fair and actionable, we evaluated each tool using three core criteria:
Can it surface meaningful gaps in how AI models crawl, understand, or display your content?
Does it provide next-step clarity—not just charts, reports, or keyword fluff?
Is it accessible and usable for small teams, solo marketers, and non-enterprise budgets?
Curious about the results? Let’s find out.
Table of Contents
What we actually looked for in each AI SEO tool
Once we cut through the inflated claims and vague promises, we focused on one thing: whether a tool could help us understand—and improve—how our content performs in AI-driven environments. That meant getting specific about what each product needed to do.
First, we wanted to see whether the tool could show us where our visibility breaks down.

We were looking for signs that it could track whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot were actually accessing our content—and where they weren’t. Could it tell us which pages were being crawled, ignored, or misunderstood by these bots? Could it show us which parts of our site were surfacing in LLM responses, and which were being overlooked entirely? Most tools either guessed or ignored this altogether.
Second, we wanted next-step clarity.

If the tool did identify something wrong—missing structured data, broken crawl paths, vague or low-quality content—what did it recommend we do about it? We weren’t interested in generic suggestions like “improve your content quality” or “add keywords.” We wanted tools that offered concrete steps: improve these prompts, fix this metadata, add schema to this page, remove this blocking tag. If it couldn’t go beyond diagnosis, it wasn’t useful.
Third, we looked at how usable the tool was for someone who isn’t an enterprise SEO team.

Could a solo founder or content marketer get value from it in under an hour? Was the interface clean, or did it expect you to read through exported CSVs and guess what mattered? Pricing played into this too—some tools clearly weren’t built for small businesses or teams with limited budgets. If the cost of access exceeded the clarity it gave you, we moved on.
Beyond those basics, a few tools went further than we expected. They let us explore which prompts were hitting our site, which LLMs were reusing our content, and whether our brand was being cited or stripped away. Some could even estimate AI-sourced traffic using referral patterns in GA4. These features weren’t common—but when we saw them, we paid attention.
Because in a space full of inflated dashboards and placeholder “AI” features, anything that delivered real visibility—without the fluff—stood out fast.
Probe Analytics: The most balanced AI SEO tool for visibility, actionability, and access
We chose to highlight Probe first because it is the only platform that clearly met every evaluation benchmark we defined. It identifies visibility gaps in how AI engines respond to brand-related prompts. It surfaces clear, next-step opportunities to improve your visibility. And it’s built to serve small teams as well as large ones, with accessible pricing and a learning curve that doesn’t assume technical SEO knowledge.
Our Criteria | How Probe Analytics Delivers |
---|---|
Diagnoses AI visibility gaps | Real-time prompt-level tracking across LLMs—tracks whether and how you're mentioned |
Actionable recommendations | Prompt suggestions |
Accessible UX + fair pricing | Clean dashboards |
Focus on AI crawler visibility (GEO) | Purpose-built for AI answer engines; citation- and prompt-based visibility (not keyword SEO) |
Bonus: Strategic extras | Competitive insights |
Prompt-level visibility analysis

We evaluated each tool on whether it could help users identify when and where they are visible in AI model responses. Probe does this by tracking prompt-level performance across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and others.
For each prompt, Probe shows your visibility percentage, number of citations, brand position in the response, and comparison to competitors. This gives users a direct answer to the question: "If someone asked this question in an AI assistant, would my brand show up—and how prominently?"
For example, in one tracked query, "Top alternatives to popular talent mobility platforms in 2025," Fuel50 ranked #2, with 100% visibility and eight citations. In another, "Best employee engagement platforms," Fuel50 was not mentioned at all. This type of insight enables real performance benchmarking rather than guesswork.
Ongoing tracking and recommendations

Knowing your visibility today is valuable. But in a rapidly evolving AI search landscape, daily changes can affect whether or not your brand is cited tomorrow. Probe tracks prompt performance over time and notifies you of meaningful changes—such as if your brand was replaced, dropped, added, or moved.

Beyond tracking, Probe provides prompt suggestions based on your industry, current gaps, and emerging questions that matter to your audience. These suggestions are mapped to real visibility patterns. If your competitors are appearing in prompts like "best talent development software" and you’re not, you’ll see that—and be able to act.
This aligns directly with our evaluation criteria of actionability. Probe doesn’t simply surface data. It gives you the right prompts to target, tells you why they matter, and shows which competitors are gaining share.
Attribution and traffic connection

Probe goes beyond visibility metrics by integrating with GA4. That allows you to see which pages on your site are receiving traffic from AI tools like Perplexity, ChatGPT, or Claude.
During our test, one brand received 275 sessions in the past month from generative engines. That data was tied to specific pages, referral domains, and timestamps. This closes the loop from visibility to actual outcomes, a critical differentiator we didn’t see in most other tools.
Built for marketers and growth teams
Accessibility was one of our core evaluation lenses. We prioritized tools that deliver high-quality intelligence without requiring a technical SEO or data science background.
Probe’s interface is designed to support fast onboarding and confident usage. Users can test new prompts, track competitors, receive alerts, and explore performance—all from a single, unified dashboard. You don’t need to be trained in AI to understand how to improve your AI visibility.
At $99/month, Probe also offers the most balanced ratio of depth and cost. The platform is priced for individual marketers and small teams but offers capabilities we expected only from enterprise-tier software.
Competitive awareness and prompt intelligence

Finally, Probe includes several features that expand visibility beyond your own brand. You can track how often competitors are cited in LLM responses, see which prompts they dominate, and identify phrases where your brand could close the gap.
You can also audit individual prompts to understand how engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini respond—down to the source links, sentiment, and branded vs. unbranded mention types. This level of granularity is vital for understanding how and why visibility changes.
Probe isn’t the loudest tool on the market, but it is the most complete. It meets every meaningful AI SEO criteria we tested—visibility diagnostics, actionable recommendations, and accessibility across budgets and skill levels. If you want to understand and grow your AI search presence with confidence, this is where you start.
The 4 other tools we tested (And why they fell short)
Many AI SEO tools today focus on visibility—but few help you take action. We tested four of the most talked-about platforms in 2025, comparing each one against a clear set of criteria:
Can it identify AI visibility gaps?
Does it provide actionable next steps (not just charts)?
Is it accessible for small teams, not just the enterprise?
Does it track real AI crawler behavior (not just rankings)?
Here’s how they measured up:
Tool | Visibility Tracking | Actionable Insights | Accessibility | AI Bot Tracking |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peec.ai | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Profound | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ No | ⚠️ Partial |
Ahrefs Brand Radar | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ⚠️ Steep Pricing | ❌ No |
Scrunch AI | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Peec.ai: Best for simple AI visibility snapshots

Peec offers strong visibility tracking across generative engines. It shows how your brand appears in responses from ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, along with visibility percentage, citation share, and competitor mentions. It also includes a prompt suggestion feature that analyzes your site and proposes relevant prompts to track—helpful for brands starting from scratch.
The interface is fast and lightweight. You can see visibility results immediately after entering a prompt, and the onboarding process is minimal. This makes it one of the more accessible tools for individual marketers or small teams who want a quick overview of how they're showing up.
Where Peec doesn’t go as far is in offering support beyond the visibility layer. It doesn’t provide next-step recommendations, historical visibility trends, or content guidance. There’s no ability to connect prompt exposure with GA4 data, audit crawl issues, or understand which content is contributing to citations. It surfaces what’s happening—but stops short of helping you change it.
In the context of our evaluation, Peec performs well on visibility diagnostics and user accessibility, but less so on actionability. For teams who already know what to do with prompt-level insights, it’s a capable tracking tool. For those looking to close visibility gaps or understand how prompt data translates into real outcomes, it leaves some work on the table.
Ahrefs Brand Radar: Best for massive prompt index breadth

Ahrefs Brand Radar promises expansive AI visibility tracking, surfacing where your brand appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other major platforms. It draws from a claimed 100 million–prompt dataset and layers in sentiment analysis, web mentions, and share of voice metrics across multiple “indexes.”
This diagnostic scope is one of its core selling points—but it’s also where the tool raises questions. The origins of its indexed prompt data are not disclosed, making it difficult to validate the accuracy or completeness of what’s being measured. Some indexes come with vague naming conventions (e.g., “Web Visibility Index,” “Search Demand Index”), and it’s unclear how these relate to actual user behavior across AI models.
The platform also offers “prompt traffic” estimates—suggesting certain queries generate more exposure than others—but this introduces another layer of abstraction. Prompts in AI are highly contextual and variable, unlike search queries. Collapsing them into traffic metrics risks misleading teams into chasing phantom volume that may not reflect how users actually interact with LLMs.
In terms of pricing and accessibility, Brand Radar sits at the high end. For full index access, users must pay $699/month. Even existing Ahrefs users face a separate charge—$129/month (or $108/month annually)—to access just the basic Search Demand and Web Visibility indexes. These entry-tier features offer limited scope and can quickly run out, forcing teams to upgrade or work around constraints.
Finally, while Brand Radar does help with visibility diagnostics, it doesn’t yet support structured content recommendations, traffic attribution, or tactical prompt-level actions. It's an observability layer, not an optimization engine.
For enterprise users already embedded in the Ahrefs ecosystem, the integration may be convenient. For small teams or strategy-first marketers looking for clearer next steps and validated data, the tool may feel more like an expensive black box than a strategic ally.
Profound: Best for large enterprise visibility and multilingual scale

Profound is designed for brands that want to operationalize AI visibility at scale. It offers clear diagnostics across major AI engines—ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, and others—by analyzing how brands and competitors appear in responses. It supports prompt-level tracking, daily frequency monitoring, and multilingual coverage for global teams.
The platform also includes guided action. Users can generate up to 15 content briefs per month (Lite plan) or unlimited on enterprise plans. Each brief is based on visibility insights and aligned to opportunities where your brand is underperforming. This adds directional value, especially for teams looking to scale content based on AI exposure data.
Profound’s strongest differentiator is its managed service layer. Enterprise customers receive support from a dedicated AI Search Strategist, with access to custom recommendations, competitive audits, and Slack-based assistance. These services give larger teams the support structure to manage multiple domains, languages, and products across geographies.
The Lite plan starts at $499/month. It includes AI platform insights, prompt tracking across four engines, 24,000 responses per month, three seats, and basic integrations with Google Analytics, Vercel, Cloudflare, and others. While the breadth of platforms is strong, some setup steps—like configuring Vercel or Cloudflare—require technical knowledge that may be challenging for non-developers.
In the context of our evaluation, Profound performs well on visibility diagnostics and guided next steps. It surfaces prompt-level gaps, supports content execution, and includes team-level support. Accessibility is more limited. The pricing, complexity of setup, and technical integration requirements make it better suited to larger teams with developer resources—not small businesses or lean marketing teams.
For brands operating across multiple regions and needing strategic scale, Profound delivers the breadth and infrastructure to support them. For teams looking for fast setup or day-one visibility into action, there may be simpler paths.
Scrunch AI: Best for brand sentiment and misinformation tracking

Scrunch AI approaches AI visibility through the lens of brand safety, sentiment monitoring, and customer journey impact. Rather than just showing whether your brand appears in Claude or ChatGPT, it highlights how your brand shows up—positive, negative, neutral, or misinformed. This framing is especially valuable for larger organizations concerned with trust, outdated content, or misleading AI responses that may affect perception at scale.
One of Scrunch’s more distinctive features is its technical “Bot Traffic” module, which detects whether AI crawlers are hitting your site and flags early-stage crawlability or tagging issues. This can help pinpoint visibility gaps rooted in technical barriers, rather than just content quality. However, the tool doesn’t go much further than diagnosis. It identifies problems, but doesn’t offer structured recommendations or next-step workflows. There are no built-in prompt suggestions, metadata adjustments, or competitive prompt benchmarking to help close the loop between discovery and action.
Scrunch’s positioning also skews toward enterprise teams. While some users report meaningful gains—like a 40% lift in AI-driven conversions—there’s limited clarity on how those improvements are attributed or tracked. There are no integrations with GA4 or equivalent analytics platforms, which means marketers still have to guess how AI exposure connects to traffic or pipeline. That gap makes it harder for small teams to justify the platform’s investment. For enterprise brands focused on protecting brand integrity in generative responses, Scrunch may be worth exploring. For others, the lack of actionability and attribution could be limiting.
So, which AI SEO tool should you use?
If you're looking for broad brand monitoring across millions of prompts—without needing next-step action—Ahrefs Brand Radar or Profound might fit the bill. They’re solid choices for enterprise teams that already have analysts, strategists, and internal systems to translate visibility into execution.
If you want lightweight dashboards that help you track how often your brand is mentioned in ChatGPT or Claude, and you don’t mind paying a premium for it, Peec.ai offers a simple and visually appealing experience.
If your focus is on reputation management—flagging misinformation, tracing AI-driven user journeys, or detecting bot activity—Scrunch AI is built around that use case. It’s more about brand protection than growth.
But if you actually want to improve your visibility across AI answer engines—not just observe it—Probe is built for you.
It gives you prompt-level insights, competitive benchmarking, attribution data, and suggested actions in one place. You’re not just seeing what happened. You’re learning why—and what to do next.
That’s what separates a visibility tracker from a real AI SEO tool.
Similar Content You Might Want To Read
Discover more insights and perspectives on related topics

Why We’re Building the Best Tool For Tracking Brand Visibility in AI Search Platforms


50 Generative Engine Optimization Statistics That Matter in 2026


The 35 Best AI Marketing Tools in 2026


How To Rank On ChatGPT (Based On Analysis Of 65,000 Prompt Citations)


AthenaHQ vs Profound: Which GEO Platform Actually Delivers?


What is Generative Engine Optimization?
